Talk:Uncyclopedia

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Uncyclopedia article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Archives: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6: 3 months

This topic contains controversial issues, some of which have reached a consensus for approach and neutrality, and some of which may be disputed. Before making any potentially controversial changes to the article, please carefully read the discussion-page dialogue to see if the issue has been raised before, and ensure that your edit meets all of Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Please also ensure you use an accurate and concise edit summary.

This page is not a forum for general discussion about Uncyclopedia. Any such comments may be removed or refactored. Please limit discussion to improvement of this article. You may wish to ask factual questions about Uncyclopedia at the Reference desk.

Uncyclopedia was one of the Engineering and technology good articles, but it has been removed from the list. There are suggestions below for improving the article to meet the good article criteria. Once these issues have been addressed, the article can be renominated. Editors may also seek a reassessment of the decision if they believe there was a mistake.

Article milestones
Date	Process	Result
January 24, 2006	Articles for deletion	Kept
July 23, 2006	Articles for deletion	Kept
January 19, 2007	Peer review	Reviewed
January 21, 2007	Articles for deletion	Kept
January 22, 2007	Articles for deletion	Kept
March 22, 2007	Good article nominee	Not listed
March 26, 2007	Articles for deletion	Kept
April 7, 2007	Articles for deletion	Kept
November 27, 2007	Peer review	Reviewed
November 27, 2007	Articles for deletion	Speedily kept
November 29, 2007	Good article nominee	Listed
March 30, 2008	Featured article candidate	Not promoted
May 18, 2008	Good article reassessment	Delisted
Current status: Delisted good article

Websites: Computing Low‑importance

	This article is part of WikiProject Websites, an attempt to create and link together articles about the major websites on the web. To participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page.WebsitesWikipedia:WikiProject WebsitesTemplate:WikiProject WebsitesWebsites
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Computing (assessed as Low-importance).

Internet culture Mid‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Internet culture, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of internet culture on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Internet cultureWikipedia:WikiProject Internet cultureTemplate:WikiProject Internet cultureInternet culture

Mid

This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

WikiProject Internet culture To-do:

Here are some tasks awaiting attention:

Article requests : View all requested internet culture articles
Expand : Pick an article from here or here
Photo : Category:Internet culture articles needing images
Stubs : All stubs are located here
Other : Category:Internet self-classification codes (!?); Try to get YouTube to FA; Tag all articles you find with {{WikiProject Internet culture}}
- See also Category:Internet culture articles needing attention

Comedy Mid‑importance

	Comedy portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Comedy, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of comedy on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ComedyWikipedia:WikiProject ComedyTemplate:WikiProject ComedyComedy
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Wikipedia Mid‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Wikipedia, a collaborative effort to improve Wikipedia's encyclopedic coverage of itself. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page. Please remember to avoid self-references and maintain a neutral point of view, even on topics relating to Wikipedia.WikipediaWikipedia:WikiProject WikipediaTemplate:WikiProject WikipediaWikipedia
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Note: This talk page has been blanked and its archives broken several times since it was created in 2005. Old talk page comments can be found in the page history.

how many sites does this article cover

It is not clear which one, or which ones, the article text talks about.

For instance, the lead claim "The English version has approximately 37,000 pages of content, second only to the Portuguese," is that about en.uncyclopedia.co or uncyclopedia.com?

CapnZapp (talk) 15:06, 23 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Both 'co' and 'com' uncyclopedias are over 37,000 articles. So the line could be changed to say both versions are in a similar position on article count. --Gepid (talk) 23:32, 13 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Can I upload a somewhat bigger screenshot?

I would like to overwrite the current screenshot with one in 640x360px. I find 320x159 to be a little bit destructive and hard to look at. Is it ok if I do that? AuroraANovaUma ^-^ (talk) 21:14, 18 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected edit request on 8 January 2025

This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request.

In the table for Uncyclomedia projects, there is an inaccuracy I would like to correct. UnGames is not a parody of Choose-Your-Own-Adventure books, they are a parody of Wikipedia:Wikipedia games. Parting Shot (talk) 03:40, 8 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Not done: please provide reliable sources that support the change you want to be made. A1Cafel (talk) 02:54, 10 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@A1Cafel: Here's a reference: [1] Not all the games are like Choose-your-own-adventures, only the ones in the "Adventure Games" section. For example, [2]. Parting Shot (talk) 03:08, 10 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Re-open for you. --A1Cafel (talk) 03:10, 10 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

A citation from the project itself is not something Wikipedia regards as a "reliable source." I would bet there is no reliable source; that no news article about Uncyclopedia has discussed it in such detail as to state what the basis is for individual subprojects. Reliable source or no, if the table is to remain in the article, it ought to be correct, and project participants are a trustworthy source. For my money, the text of the Subprojects section is a sufficient explanation; the table — like the basis of an individual joke — is an attempt to document lore of the project in Wikipedia. Spike-from-NH (talk) 19:45, 10 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Not done: please provide reliable sources that support the change you want to be made. (3OpenEyes' communication receptacle) | (PS: Have a good day) (acer was here) 16:06, 3 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

"Oncyclopedia" listed at Redirects for discussion

The redirect Oncyclopedia has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Readers of this page are welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2025 April 4 § Oncyclopedia until a consensus is reached. 1234qwer 1234qwer 4 12:07, 4 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

"Psyklopedin" listed at Redirects for discussion

The redirect Psyklopedin has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Readers of this page are welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2025 April 18 § Psyklopedin until a consensus is reached. Jay 💬 08:04, 18 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

"Uncapaedia" listed at Redirects for discussion

The redirect Uncapaedia has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Readers of this page are welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2025 April 18 § Uncapaedia until a consensus is reached. Jay 💬 08:09, 18 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]